Should WWE advertise the Money in the Bank Ladder Match as one match and as it's main event for the ppv?WWE Money in the Bank ppv is scheduled for July 15, 2012. It's supposed to stick to last years format of 2 MITB ladder matches 1 for Raw 1 for Smackdown. But the roster has been completely depleted. We see the exact same guys on both Raw and Smackdown so why not make it one match 6, 8, or 10 guys here's... |
Sure I guess thats an ok idea but I think they already the WWE advertise there traditional Money In The Bank Ladder Match like a main event match because when you win that match you get a gaurenteed any championship of your own choosing of up to one year which could lead you to the top spotlight like when Edge won his Money In The Bank Match at Wrestle Mania 21 (Wrestle Mania goes hollywood) which lead Edge to his first WWE Championship where he cashed it in at New Years Revolution 2006 on John Cena after his match inside the Elimination Chamber for the WWE Championship.
I agree with you and I'd go further than that too. I think MITB should go back to being a one off gimmick match at Mania or on a diff PPV like summerslam. But thats not the question. I kinda hate the MITB concept cos we all know how the cases will be cashed in (i.e CHEAP 3 second match victories on K.O'd champs) But yes, it SHOULD be ONE match cos 2 briefcases with that contract is just too much and it FORCES WWE to push guys too soon who aren't quite ready to main event yet, i.e say sin cara were to win it, Ok, he has 12 months to cash in BUT, it might take longer than those 12 months for him to actually get to the stage where he's ready and ABLE to carry the title and cos he gets pushed too soon, the fans react badly to it and it ruins him for a good few years and sets him back. But yeah, It was DEF more interesting when it was just ONE case and not 2 and shouldn't be a PPV by any means, If it were up to me, I'd replace MITB the PPV and bring back In Your House as that PPV had it's share of gimmicks thrown in anyways i.e 1997 In Your House: The Final Four after the 1997 RR match when there wasn't a "legit" winner cos Monsoon came out and declared cos Austin was eliminated and re-entered to winTaker Vade and Bret weren't legally thrown out and it set up the Final Four PPV. Doing that ALSO gives WWE room to change the gimmick of the PPV every year and try out new things too :) But MITB NEEDS to go back to just one match, just one case for it to mean anything again!
rule #1 not everybody should be in a ladder match
rule #2 it should mean something
rule #3 don't cheapen it by having 6 other PPV that include the #1 contender spot
I didn't bother reading all of that it should just be a wm match nothing more have maybe 8 superstars 4 raw n sd at wm that want the title let it be maybe some people that have potential
Yes!! Yes!! Yes!!
